Solos
+ All
Fashion
Places
Video
About
Shop
“Don’t get offended. But from a distance, at distance, our faces are somewhat similar” – says Rita Blanco to Carolina Amaral at the beginning of the Zoom call, one in Lisbon, the other in Guimarães, and how beautiful are the similarities that shorten the distance between those we love. Which we love, just because, since affinities do not call for cause or relationship, or because the hair tone is darker, or the eyebrows are thicker, or because there is a sugary energy left in the air or the eyes’ spark remind us how happy we once were in our inexperience. This is how Carolina and Rita intertwine, between the root-similarities and the glasses that observe the world in different degrees – it unites them, the way they see books, the seriousness with which they tend to their art, and a natural connection and gratitude for, in a recent project that joined them both, being pillars and networks of salvation, lap, hug and nest, or, in the words of Blanco, “women who came together and support each other, and that is very nice”.
RB – My questions are going to sound very basic in the beginning, but we will arrive somewhere. I would like to know why are you an actress, what brought you here?
CA – Do you want to know something funny? You were just talking about my energy, my phonetics, and it is something that accompanies me since I was a child, always feeling inadequate in the places I frequented. It was often portrayed, on one hand, as if it were a compliment, I was outgoing, but on the other hand, it could also be overcompensated. I could be almost crazy.
Always very agitated, very curious, wouldn’t shut up, talking, talking, talking and, sometimes, in the contexts I was, I ended up not feeling adjusted or integrated – not that I felt such as an affront, but I was very criticized. I lived up in the Azores, São Miguel, until the age of four because my father is Azorean, and came to the north of Portugal, Guimarães, to a new school, and there was a party at the end of the year in which I was invited to participate. My mom told me that at the time she was very worried and went to speak with the Sisters and the educators, ‘she will ruin the show because she has so much energy, she is going to wreck it. It’s not a good idea”, but they told her they knew what they were doing. I still have the physical and sensorial memory of being very flushed and feeling this big rush of energy through me, but in a surrealistic context, since it was a play that had many characters and almost everything was mime, but there was Sister doing voices, moving around from one side to the other, always there. And I remember feeling very included. Of course, it is only possible to realize what happened with some distance, but, in fact, looking back, I felt very at ease, very loose, free and not at all condemned. So much that at the end of the show, I remember different parents went up to my mother and told her that I had “a knack for becoming an artist”. I was strangely appreciated and not only associated that moment with well-being and creative freedom, but also with a sense of inclusion in a place. Neither more, nor less, I felt adequate, and I believe it was the first time I felt accepted by others somehow, but I also saw my energy serving a bigger purpose than me and reaching out to others. Following the parties and entering ballet, that possibility of integrating an imaginary, a project that touches others and where I don’t feel inadequate, on the contrary, that I can use it and take this imaginary with me, it was something transformative. The flesh, the thought, the intuition. It was almost encrusted. So much that despite everything - and I don’t belong to a family of artists, I have family members with great sensibilities, but I never had big examples and references around me – when the time came, to me, it was as clear as water, – and I am someone interested in several areas, I love literature, philosophy, so, I could have gone that way, and it would certainly have stimulated and satisfied me. That choice was not exactly determined, it was something obvious, and at the same time intimidating because it was imposed by my nature and imaginary, otherwise I would be frustrating myself and withering.
RB – It’s funny because there are many points in common. Well, I never felt much pleasure, I hate it, but still.
CA – Do you know that sometimes I think: what if I stop now? What if I don’t go on? It was much easier to stay comfortably at home, doing my readings, writing…
RB – Precisely: I believe you are a diligent reader, isn’t it? You love reading books. I became an actress – we are not here to talk about me – because of books. Do you think this has also influenced you?
CA – My mother calmed me down through the habit of reading. It was the only way to control me, my agitation, my will, my “unstopability”, if that word exists, I like to make up words (laughs).
RB – It does now.
CA – Reading has always soothed and nourished me immensely. It is a fundamental part of my day-to-day life, of my experience, and I believe that the sensibility was also exacerbated by my reading habits.
RB – Imagination?
CA – It seems I get addicted to this expansion of the imagination through books. It’s a consuming thing.
RB – It consoles you, too!
CA – And it soothes me while simulating me tremendously. As a child, my mother instigated this habit to see if it would calm me down. And, suddenly, a phenomenon happened, which was my mother asking me to read less. That annoyed me. Nobody ever reads too much, reading is endless. I made lists and lists of books that I know that even if I lived every day reading a book, I wouldn’t read them all. I believe it is something that, in our profession, contributes to nurturing the imagination, the sensibility, something which hardens and enriches.
RB – Give us more texture. Through reading, we get to know millions of people, millions of viewpoints, which we would never access otherwise for more experiences we had.
CA – I have just finished reading Fiódor Dostoiévski Humiliated and Insulted, which left a great impression on me. It was a writer I started discovering when I was 15 years old and picked up its Crime and Punishment by impulse. In the one I just read, for example, he speaks about one of the feelings, love, that we believe we know a lot about it because it is around us throughout our lives. And suddenly, while reading a Russian writer of the XIX century talking about love, it seems like someone has slapped me. The unpretentious and simple way he used to speak about this unrequited love between two characters, and still calling it love, left me KO, and all the comprehension I had about the world seems to have widened in a way I was not expecting at all. He got me off the mat in a very positive way. So, this issue of the presence of the literature and its ability to help us densify while letting us more vulnerable is something that it’s not only poetic, but effective in my daily life as a human being and in the work I do.
RB – When I look at an actor that I love, whatever that means, I like to know what he eats, what goes through his mind and so on. I want to see his choices somehow. And your choices, obviously, are ‘stuffed’, come with weight and density.
CA – I am capable of speaking about the books I read, but often they enter that place, which is filled with dreams, nightmares and frights, and a certain restlessness that is better tackled in terms of images and sensations more than speech. They work a lot on the dark side for me, too.
RB – So, isn’t that what we live for? Isn’t theatre the art of the error, of failing? Now, let me ask you something, what do you think is it for? I don’t care what you think is good for you, or it can be that as well, and there is no harm in it. My question is, do you believe it is a mission, that there is an ethical dimension that is important to respect? To become an actor, I mean. Nowadays, ethically speaking, all professional activities seem somewhat distorted. I ask you if you feel this is significant, or not, and then we’ll move to the international.
CA – I think it is crucial that we remain connected to our motivations and to what brings us there. Being, let’s say, almost faithful and continue believing. On the why we are doing it.
RB – And why?
CA – What I see, my truth, is a sense of mission to serve. To me, an artistic object has to touch the other, the public, change them, disturb them, challenge them, so that in these endless provocations that art stirs and allows us to reflect on the existence and human condition. So that we can actually be a part of the community, find our place in the world and assist each spectator, each person contacting with a work, to be more in himself while having the possibility of getting lost – because many times in this society which is almost 100% monitored, in which we monitor one another, we give very few spaces to error, to that obscurity. To fall into a kind of abyss that sometimes make us find each other more. I believe that in art objects, when there is that provocation, and we manage to reach the people, people can find a powerful version of themselves, contributing to a necessarily better or more awake world, a more alert one.
RB – In fact, more and more, if an artist is unable to stir and to be socially active, the world does not evolve in the practical sense of the thing, of the people well-being. An artist must have utility, otherwise… An example that I love is Matisse. It is impressive how his revolt and aggressiveness was so creative and disturbing. And it made us think – it makes us think even today. How is that possible? How good it is that artists and people are standing out and changing our lives. But, well, it doesn’t matter now.
Silly question, in this profession, what do you like the most, and what do you not like at all? One that is fun for you, another that you don’t like at all.
CA – The part that crosses me while having to do with a sort of sacrifice, surrender, a vortex that consumes me and makes me lose control. At the same time, it almost launches me into another dimension, which nourishes and fascinates me. Only when I leave the mood, when I am not in it. When I am crossed, I am not exactly quite aware of it. I am just enjoying and surrendering and that can happen in an improvisation rehearsal, it can happen in a very subtle or simple moment, an encounter, even in something smaller.
Something I don’t like very much, but only when I think about it, when I don’t, it doesn’t hurt me. If I stop to think about it – which is something that sometimes is not good – it’s the issue of the exposure. What frustrates me the most or leaves me restless, in a bad sense, has to do with my return to the faculties of the day-to-day life of Carolina, real, the everyday life. If I start thinking a lot, “why do I do this? Why do I expose myself this way?”, it prompts embarrassment, awkwardness, shame. But if I stop and think that the Carolina who is falling is still me.
RB – You better not.
CA – But transported to an imaginary story and vision. I am lost from the centre, my ego, it’s almost like I am in service. I am telling a story, so I am behind. I am showing a front, I am instigating, but really if I stop a little and observe from a distance, I think “but what do I think I am to summon people’s time?” .
RB – But sometimes it can also feel shameful to enjoy experiencing this so much. This thing of the ego, in an actor, must be muzzled all the time. We have to live with it, so if there is no muzzle…
CA – I think it is good from the moment you reflect on it and question yourself. Question our place, if we are still serving. There are many conjuring tricks, especially when we have many eyes on us. We can lose focus of what is important, so we must remain vigilant.
Top and skirt Marques'Almeida
Shoes Esc
Dress Luís Carvalho
Shoes Reve de Flo
RB – I would like to know something, just because I want to know but has nothing to do with being an actress or not. What makes you momentarily happy? Happiness is not constant, or maybe it is. What is so good?
CA – A good tiramisu… vegan! (laughter)
RB – Are you saying it because I am here? (laughter)
CA – You know I don’t eat meat too (laughter). But one thing that makes me happy is… I shouldn’t be thinking so much, should I?
RB – You might think, I can go somewhere else now, if you want.
CA – It’s just that can be very common-places.
RB – Then don’t say it. If you don’t feel like it, I can ask you something else. Do you want to be only an actress, or is there something else in your mind?
CA – I feel the need to create my objects, imbued with my visions, with what I project. Not doing it just because, but because it crosses me fiercely. And there are some themes, some areas, that have to do with the sacred and with the dimension of faith and religion. Honestly, religion in the XXI century, how do we establish a connection when feeling spiritual dimension and, in my case, since I went to nun’s school, there is a catholic imaginary very encrusted, which speaks to me a lot. My will is to reinterpret that symbolism as to give it other meaning and other vision and disturbance. Today, in the here and now, create a reinterpretation of the catholic gestures and oratory using art to build new meanings that can approach us to the sense of the divine, and the human community relationship’s with the divine, although faith has a lot to do with an individual relationship.
RB – I want to see that.
CA – I wrote a manifesto and a kind of performative dead, which are poems for blind people too, that are now in the edition’s process. An author’s edition because I was interested in launching this object book already with an intervention. It has something that has been accompanying me for quite some time, with many readings, written framework, and it is closer now to reverberate to that side of creation. Of course, it is something very specific, a very particular universe, it is my view. These are my concerns. Not that I don’t have others, but artistically speaking what I am most invested now in composing has to do with this, with this sacred dimension, religion, specifically the Catholic religion, reinterpreting it in our century through art.
I concluded a project in 2017, from May to October, called Stella Matutina, in which I did an intervention in public spaces on every 13th of the month. One of the interventions consisted of seven female bodies floating for 13 minutes in central fountains of Lisbon, dressed in black. I wanted to observe the reactions. Another was me dressed almost in a burka entering a church, being barred.
RB – To conclude, I could ask you with whom you wish to work in the future, but life will arrange those meetings. Instead, what do you think is vital to being an actor? To give something to others. I used to speak about an orange when I was younger, saying “being an actor is like an orange, and one must complete the whole circle, each segment contains a specificity, like generosity, and so on”. I look to you and I want to remember my youth.
CA – Reconnecting or connecting with the places and memories of childhood is vital to our work – of amazement, surrender, of the ability to let go and be dazzled and, at the same time, to believe. Another thing: a sense of sacrifice. It has to do with giving ourselves without pre-judgments. Generosity. The ability to look at the other and believe is the first and primary connection there is between human beings, and the support of this communication is an uncompromising generosity. To build, we must build together and believe this is the only way things can happen. That almost magic of losing ourselves positively in what we are doing and discovering new senses and meanings, knowing that many of them we will not learn because they are on the other side and we have already mastered many things. But trust too. Trust the people we are with, establishing a trusting network to allow the work to manifest an ethical side I believe is essential. The openness of oneself to oneself, of often returning to the initial place to reconnect. Otherwise, everything feels like a forrobodó, a party. Returning to that initial spot of contact with that deep well.
RB – Where do you come from? It is funny that you are so young and are already there. We can never forget our roots. With all that implies. Another thing you are forgetting, although you have a lot, and it is essential, is curiosity.
CA – Of course, it has to do with the place of your childhood, the amazement. Wanting more going through the dark tunnel, we don’t know what is there, but we feel compelled to continue searching.
RB – You are a curious person who is accompanied by books, and that is very important. That is really important. A book does not let you be unhappy. I am unhappy and with a book I forget it.
Video
Fashion
Kolovrat, the brand, was born in the 90s with a responsible cultural purpose, which aggregates, reflects, adds, instigates. It remains up to date: with an intuitive creation process, the pieces created by the Bosnian-born designer bring more than meets the eye at first glance, they pierce fears and reflect them like a mirror. In Spring/Summer 2022, she has done it again and in particular in this mandala dress, a combination of silk layers that meditate on our accumulation of daily experiences.
What is the main inspiration behind this garment? How was the creative process of it?
It’s related to the geometric mandala – an evolutive process of our own mandala concept, which is somewhat what makes us focus and deliver a certain harmony. We developed the geometric process to find our very own mandala, one that speaks our individual language.
In what way did the unexpected past years lockdown contributed to this inspiration?
I was in my twenties when I started looking at what’s beyond what we feel internally, ways of opening the mind. All my collections are related with self-experience and personal moments. With the pandemic we had to find new ways again – meditation is not the right method for everyone, but there’s a certain je ne sais quoi in these mandalas, it helps harmonizing in a nonsensical way.
How did you deliver that message with this dress?
Trough the creation of shapes – tight or casual – from the geometric lines of streetwear and the discovery of sacred geometry – never forgetting the traditional garments, such as kimonos – we altered some pieces in order to build a new composition. Looking for purpose in a modern exercise like a mandala, we used fabric scraps to value the garment.
In what way does the concept of freedom served as guide for this collection and what “secret” new language is this that your garment carries?
The mandala’s intent is to make us deal with stratification and our load of personal daily experiences. Illusions come from the ego; the truth comes from the heart. We had autonomy to create graphics and patterns and invent a new language, which is secretly encrypted and not obvious at all. It is complex and simultaneously accessible. Excluding no one while being exclusive. When we embrace color, we find freedom.
Places
Women and Hitchcock, where to start? They were the antidote for male characters; the director’s muses could be playing the minor role, but they were always central figures of the cinematographic climax and led us to a beauty fantasy that few encountered earlier. In this torturous bond, Alfred Hitchcock built his legacy as King of suspense, inspired by mystery and showering fashion with this 7th art vision. In a game of light and contrast, Cláudia Barros is the director of Carolina Amaral’s shooting and tells us about her favorite scenes of Hitchcock’s leading ladies.
“Grace Kelly is Lisa Fremont, a successful woman in the fashion industry, in love with Jeff (James Stewart), a photojournalist. In this debut scene, while speaking to Jeffries, Lisa smokes a cigarette; only, looks deceive. Grace Kelly never smoked in movies, but Hitchcock negotiates and, on that scene, Lisa smokes… only she doesn’t. We see the actual moment in which she lights up the cigarette, but the scene is cut, and immediately we see Jeff. When the camera turns to Lisa again, we believe she’s smoking because the cigarette is actually lit on her hand, although that never happened. I love this fun fact, it takes me to the magic of cinema and the power put in on the implied picture – sometimes we think we saw something that never happened, it only seemed to be happening.”
Vertigo (1958)
Psycho (1960)
“Kim Novak is Judy on this scene, but before she was Madeleine. Puzzled? Watch the movie. While Scottie (James Stewart) speaks from his bedroom door, Judy seats backlighted on the couch. We only have visual access to this dark silhouette and the rest of the shot is neon green. What’s impressive for me there is that we could only see her silhouette and yet we feel all her emotions – disappointment and sadness. The immenseness of the green also weights on, making us feel melancholic.
“Janet Leigh (Marion) drives on the run after taking her boss’s money. While we visualize a frontal shot of Marion’s expressions driving, in voice off we listen to Marion’s own head fictional narrative and hear possible dialogues – when her boss and co-worker find out she took off with the money or when the police start investigating the robbery. While we listen to this narrative, the character’s expressions shift from restlessness and fear to confidence. For me this scene represents something way realer: how many times, while driving, do we overthink about everything and nothing and also, how many narratives do we build on hypothetical dialogues? It illustrates how fast humans can hit multiple emotions and traits, from innocence to presumption.
Team
Hair Rui Rocha with Kerástase products
Make up Raquel Ribeiro with Sisley products
Photography assistants Pedro Sá, Márcio Duarte @ Lalaland Studios
Fashion Assistant Patrícia Oliveira
Video Raul Sousa
Retouching José Paulo Reis @ Lalaland Studios
Production Diogo Oliveira @ Lalaland Studios
Text Patrícia Domingues
Share to: